Trump & Teddy Roosevelt-A Phony Populist vs. a Real One

Posted by

Hello everyone. Recently I became a contributing writer for Politically Speaking, a publication at I wanted to share my first post with you and will do so in the future as well. I apologize in advance for using the former guy’s name-as well as writing anything about him. My pledge is to minimize the crazy man as much as possible. But this post really goes to the overall concept of populism, and how it can be used in a good way-and a despicable and dangerous way as well. Anyway, here is an excerpt. I’d greatly appreciate it if you click the link at the end and finish reading over at Medium. Thank you everybody!

Imagine a scenario where an ex-president broke away from his political party to form a new and exciting one based on reforming democracy as we know it. Things like standing up to corporations, providing health care to all Americans, guaranteed employment, and protecting senior citizens with a form of social insurance to guard against poverty.

Now imagine another scenario. However, this involves an ex-president who also breaks away from his party, but his platform is nowhere near the same as the first example. No, this particular platform consists of re-establishing white supremacy, strict anti-immigration policies, reduced taxes for the rich, massive deregulation of corporations, and a move to circumvent a free press’s rights.

The first scenario happened in 1912, with the ex-president being none other than Theodore Roosevelt. Disillusioned with fellow Republican and successor William Howard Taft, Roosevelt gave rise to the new Progressive Party, challenging Taft in that year’s election and winning 9 of the 12 primary contests against him. The GOP, however, ended up nominating Taft anyway, angering Roosevelt, which provided the impetus for running as the nominee for his new third-party.

While Roosevelt ultimately fell short in his bid for a third term as president, he garnered significant support throughout the country — winning 27 percent of the popular vote and 88 electoral votes in the process. However, his entry into the race allowed Woodrow Wilson to pull off a victory for the Democrats, as Taft only won two states.

Undoubtedly, Roosevelt’s populist message resonated with much of America and, indeed, compelled Democrats to nominate Wilson, their own progressive candidate. Had they not done that, historians say that Roosevelt most likely would have won the 1912 presidential election.

The second scenario mentioned above is strictly hypothetical, for it pertains to the disgraced 45th ex-president Donald J. Trump. There’s been talk that Trump may form his own party, and the policies in this example merely reflect those that he pursued as president and would most likely pursue as the leader of a new Trump Party, or whatever it might be called. Again, we may never know because none of us can ever know what resides in Trump’s demented mind.

But what if Trump formed a new party along the lines of what Teddy Roosevelt helped create in 1912? What if he used his huge personality and influence to do positive things for the American people? You never know; he might be able to pull something like that off.

When you think about Roosevelt and Trump, it’s unlikely you’d find much commonality. However, there is one thing: both had enormous personalities and an aggressive and assertive approach to politics.

Indeed, part of Roosevelt’s pledge to reform democracy rested upon the idea of an extremely powerful presidency that would rely on communicating directly to voters through, at what was at that time, an emerging mass media with independent newspapers, popular magazines, audio recordings, and movies. Sort of the modern-day version of social media when you think about it.

Taft, for his part, warned of Roosevelt’s ‘progressive democracy’ amounting “to nothing but the establishment of a benevolent despotism.” There was a definite fear amongst the political elites that Roosevelt’s intentions were nothing more than a selfish power grab over our democratic institutions.

Sounds a bit familiar. After all, what we witnessed on January 6, 2021, was a violent and physical attempt to overthrow the American people’s will in a legitimate and legal election. It was a power grab of gargantuan audacity, something even Teddy Roosevelt would have certainly frowned upon.

To continue reading, please head over to Politically Speaking at Medium


  1. Reblogged this on Filosofa's Word and commented:
    Our friend Jeff from On the Fence Voters has a new venue … he’s a contributing writer for Politically Speaking, a publication at Today, he has written his first piece, and it is both thoughtful and thought-provoking … I hope you’ll take a look and follow him on Medium! Thanks, Jeff, for all your hard work! We’ll speak soon!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks for the nice comments Michael. Yes, if only the ‘former guy’ had the decency, smarts, and willingness to get things done for the people like Teddy did. He may not have been such a God-awful president. Oh well. Too late now!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. But what if Trump formed a new party along the lines of what Teddy Roosevelt helped create in 1912? What if he used his huge personality and influence to do positive things for the American people? You never know; he might be able to pull something like that off.

    Non sequitur. Does not compute. A leopard cannot change its spots.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Jeff, I have seen people try to lump these two together, but the similarities are few and the differences are many. An excellent view into Teddy can be found in Ken Burn’s series “The Roosevelts.” Teddy’s father was community minded and influenced Teddy as well. When Teddy lost his wife and mother on the same day in the same house, he was so downtrodden, he lived out west for five years being with hard-working folks. This helped shape his “square deal” and environmental pushes. Teddy was the first “water” president focusing on water for drinking, irrigation and transport. Trump could care less about the environment and the only square deal he wants is what’s in it for me?

    People say Teddy did not trust the media, but he actually used them to go interview his cabinet and encouraged his cabinet to be truthful. He learned more what was going on through this process.

    So, yes both have big egos and liked to be heard, but Teddy really did like hanging out with hard-working people rather than just using them like Trump. Keith

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Funny too, Keith, they both had/have wealth. Well, with Trump, he certainly boasts that he does. But, it’s what you do with it, isn’t it? Both of the president Roosevelt’s-and the Kennedy’s for that matter, appreciated the common man and actually did things to help them. Trump, for the most part, only used them and manipulated them for his own self-aggrandizement. Big difference.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s