I apologize in advance for the pessimistic headline. I cannot come to any other conclusion.

It’s been a minute. I’ve been off this platform for a while –the most extended time since Greg and I started this blog four years ago. And to all of you who take the time to read what I write over here, I want to thank you. I can’t tell you how much it means to me.

That said, the last nearly six weeks have brought about some interesting developments in my life, including starting a part-time job and finally succumbing to Covid-19. Yes, after almost 2.5 years and being fully vaccinated and boosted, I tested positive late last month for the virus.

It wasn’t fun. But I still consider what I had to be a mild version. It took me about a week to start feeling better, but I eventually bounced back. Luckily my better half is still part of the dwindling number of people who have not gotten Covid, which makes me very happy.

Unfortunately, while those personal issues have contributed a bit to my long absence, I’d be lying if those were the only reasons. And that brings me to the pessimistic headline I apologized for at the opening of this post. I’m a lifelong progressive and member of the Democratic Party. I do not say that with regret. Those of you who read my posts know where I stand.

But I’ve grown to concede that my side is losing the battle grudgingly. And it has struck me at my core. Since my last post, I’ve lost the fire in my belly to confront the radical right on this platform. I’ve said a lot in the past four years. And I do not regret any of it. I’ve come at this from the very beginning with a sense of urgency. I knew that what I was seeing in this country looked and felt like we were in the process of losing everything.

By everything, I mean democracy itself. The election of 2016 was only the beginning. I knew deep in my soul that if the disgraced former president lost in 2020, he would not accept defeat. I wrote about that here. Sadly, my prediction was correct. I wish I’d been wrong.

We’re teetering closer than ever to the abyss. We still have not charged the dangerous ex-president, and I remain less than optimistic that we will. Again, I hope I’m wrong on this as well. But he remains an elusive target, and I’m not sure we have the people in charge with the kind of intestinal fortitude it will take to charge an ex-president.

I don’t know what it was that eventually wore me down mentally. I believe it’s been a confluence of many things, some going back more than a decade. It appalls me to no end when I think about how Democrats were asleep at the wheel while Republicans began gerrymandering on steroids in 2010.

Look at what’s happened by not taking it as seriously as the GOP did. They’ve rigged the game now to the extent where it is in the state legislatures that they’re making their most radical push to mold this country into their twisted and fascistic vision for America.

They want to take us back to the days of coat-hanger abortions, as many states are now banning the practice altogether, thanks to the radical, bought, and paid for Supreme Court of the United States. They’re going after the gay and transgender community with uncompromising zeal. They do not care who they offend. It’s the ideology, stupid. And it seems as if we’re powerless to do anything about it.

Climate change is nothing but a hoax to these people – and unlimited gun ownership seems to be the goal. With five religious nutcase radicals on the Supreme Court, three of whom were nominated and confirmed under the twice-impeached former president, we’re simply out of ammunition to confront the other side. It seems that no matter what progress we want to make, the Court is poised to strike it down, regardless of whether over 70% of the public is for it. Can you say tyranny of the minority?

With every new radical decision, the idea of a more perfect union continues to deteriorate rapidly. And now, with word that the Court will hear a case that might give legislatures the final say in our electoral process, we may be closer to democracy’s extinction than ever before.

And in this dire moment that needs met, and met vigorously, I fear that Democrats, nationally and state-wide, are not up to the task. The other side is loud and obnoxious. Democrats are meek and play by the rules. Yes, I’m being very general here because there are some Democrats out there with the appropriate hair-on-fire approach. But not enough, unfortunately.

I will admit that the January 6 Committee has given me at least some hope that people will be held to account. They’re doing an excellent job, and I’ve been paying close attention to these hearings.

But I’m left feeling somewhat hopeless that the hearings are getting this country’s people to pay attention. Most are concerned about the troubling inflation and subsequent high gas prices more than whether the former president tried to keep himself in power and overturn a legal and legitimate election.

These people couldn’t care less in my neck of the woods in rural Southwest Oregon. After the powerful last hearing, where former Trump staffer Cassidy Hutchinson revealed harrowing details of what the former president was doing on January 6 and the days leading up to it, I began to feel a little better about things.

But then I went to the grocery store and saw a couple of pickup trucks with American and Trump flags. Side by side. Traitors. That’s the word that came to mind. I won’t write the other words because some of you might be offended.

And then came the mass shooting in Highland Park, Illinois, preceded by Uvalde, Texas, and Buffalo, New York. Hell, did I forget about one? I can’t keep up anymore. And indeed, another one is about to occur any day now. Again, majorities of people in this country want stricter gun control. But what we get is a stripped-down version of gun safety legislation. So much more needs to be done. Are you optimistic it ever will, though?

We’ve dropped the ball in America. We’ve let the other side determine what kind of country they want while we sit back and wonder whether we should eliminate the filibuster or expand the Supreme Court. We know if the shoe were on the other foot, the GOP would do what they needed to put forward their radical agenda.

If they take back the Senate, you can rest assured they’ll pass an outright abortion ban. Instead of Democrats codifying Roe v Wade, they’ll codify no more abortion in America, and their radical pals on the Court will affirm it wholeheartedly.

Once again, I apologize for the downward spiral of this post. My friends, we’re losing, and we’re losing badly right now. We’re not dead. At least not yet.

I’m not ready to concede defeat. But I need some positive thoughts from all of you. Perhaps you can talk me off the ledge. Am I missing something? Is my pessimism premature?

I need help.

120 responses to “My Side is Losing”

  1. Sadly, and unfortunately, I find myself agreeing with pretty much everything you wrote. For me, what is the most discouraging is the lack of FIRE within the Democratic party. Oh sure, there are some that are making noise and rattling cages, but not near enough. It’s like they’re all in this canoe that’s just floating down the river towards the falls while they placidly enjoy the scenery.

    And what adds to the discouragement is while the voting public is getting a steady diet of the crazies (and not just on Fox!) and their radical ideas … “our side” just mutter-mutters incoherently into the wind.

    IOW … where are OUR fire-breathers? Where are OUR giants? Why isn’t someone out stomping the HELL out of these loud-mouths?

    *frustrated sigh*

    Sorry about the COVID. My other-half and I are just now winding down from it. We both had it back in 2019 before it was officially “identified” so we knew from our symptoms that it was hitting us again … and the tests confirmed it. Fortunately, with all the vaccines & boosters, our cases were *comparatively* mild. However, both of us believe this virus is not going away and it WILL be back somewhere down the road.

    Sorry for such a long comment. Just wanted you to know I can identify with all you wrote. You’re not alone.

    Liked by 7 people

    1. Thanks for the thoughtful comments Nan. Yeah, I guess you could call it a general malaise that I’m feeling. I think the one thing that has me the most down is the situation with the Supreme Court. I mean, these people are certifiably nuts. And there’s not much we can do about it.
      I’m hearing Democrats on Twitter and elsewhere talking about expanding the court etc…But, really? Can you see that actually happen? That would require a ruthlessness and spine I just don’t see from Democrats in leadership. At the very least, we should reform the Court-give them term limits, a code of ethics they must adhere to etc..Again, the odds for such a thing are very low.
      And when they say just give us a couple more Senators and we will ditch the filibuster, do we really think that’s going to happen? I think there are more Senators than just Manchin and Sinema who don’t want to touch the filibuster. We just don’t hear them talk publicly about it.
      So, we are where we are Nan. It’s not good but I plan on remaining in this fight-even if I’m a bit down on everything at the moment. We must get through this somehow. Thanks again for the comments, and all of your support over the years. I appreciate it!

      Liked by 4 people

      1. Did you happen to read my blog post a short time back on “fixing” the Supreme Court? Personally, I do NOT think adding members is the answer. Who’s to say it wouldn’t get lopsided again down the road? And the chances of adding age and/or term limits is slim to none.

        Anyway, as I said, I DO appreciate and understand what you’re feeling. I think MANY of us are “down on everything” right now. Maybe the Jan. 6th hearings will bring some relief. 🤞🤞🤞

        Liked by 4 people

      2. I did not read that Nan. I haven’t been reading much of anything lately. But I’m intrigued. I will check it out because I think you’re right about that. Let’s say we expand it to 13, then the Repubs get back in power and push it to 15, or even 20. Or hell, maybe they take it back to 9. One big mess, any way you look at it. There’s got to be a better way. I will check out your post.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Thanks.

    I agree with a lot of what you said.

    I also have not given up. But I am saddened to see what is happening.

    For me, it was obvious that the 2016 election was about the Supreme Court. But too many on the left failed to see it that way. And now the extremists have captured the court.

    Liked by 5 people

    1. Thanks Neil. And that’s what has me so demoralized. The Democrats did NOT take the Court seriously, and we’re all paying the price for it. There was a time where we could count on them to protect our democracy. That time is no longer. I just don’t know what we can do. They are on a mission to throw us back to the 1850s-not the 1950s. Our options right now are so limited. The fact Trump was able to put three of these whackos on the Court is beyond the pale. Be well Neil, and thanks for taking the time to weigh in. I really appreciate it.

      Liked by 3 people

  3. Sherri Marzick Avatar
    Sherri Marzick

    I agree with all you say Jeff but I will not give up the Democratic fight. I will March in Madison for womens right to choose as I did in DC. I follow the insurrection hearings closely and remind my friends of the truth spoken. It sickens me that Milwaukee will most likely be the seat of the RNC convention since Covid robbed us of the DNC. Keep up your posts. Keep up your fight

    Liked by 7 people

    1. Thanks for that Sherri. Good on you for still fighting. I’m not giving up. I can’t. There’s simply too much at stake. We have to find a way to turn this thing around. The radical Republican agenda must be defeated. I hope we can keep both the Senate and House. It’s gonna be a struggle, though. Keep it up Sherri!

      Liked by 2 people

  4. I’m rather new to your blog. What I’ve read I’ve enjoyed.

    I can’t say that I particularly enjoy this post.

    But I agree with it.

    I flip-flop between defeat and resignation, and a determination to not let the bastards get me down. Unfortunately every day I lean further towards the former.

    “I’m not sure we have the people in charge with the kind of intestinal fortitude it will take to charge an ex-president.”
    I’m holding out hope on this one. Garland is still in charge until January of 2025. If he’s taking the time to build a lockdown case, I’m good with that.

    “It appalls me to no end when I think about how Democrats were asleep at the wheel while Republicans began gerrymandering on steroids in 2010.”
    Their playbook is evil genius. They’ve been starting with school boards and city councils and working their way up. I’m hoping that the Dems will wake up and follow suit.

    “Once again, I apologize for the downward spiral of this post.”
    No apologies necessary. We need to sound the klaxon long, loud and frequently.

    “But I need some positive thoughts from all of you. Perhaps you can talk me off the ledge. Am I missing something? Is my pessimism premature?”
    Premature?
    No.

    Positive thoughts?
    Trump seems to be losing some of his grip. The January 6th Committee is loosening some of the Trump grip.
    We can hope that the divide between diehard MAGAts and the mainstream will fracture the GOP.

    We can hope that the recent extreme court decisions, particularly Roe, will galvanize resistance.

    I’m hoping that Abbott’s extremism in Texas will open a hole for O’Rourke to take advantage of.

    The governor of my state, California, is playing hardball and he is polling well in national polls. I’m hoping that Newsom throws his hat into the ring in the 2024 presidential race. MAYBE, more Democrats will follow Newsom’s lead. I’m seeing more Democrats being exasperated by Biden’s milquetoast posture and I think that’s a good thing. We need to admit that Biden was the placeholder whose only value was defeating Trump.

    What we CANNOT do is give up. That makes it all a fait accompli. Hang in there.

    I know that there’s a lot of hoping in there. With luck and work sometimes hope becomes fact.

    Liked by 6 people

    1. I appreciate you weighing in Paul, and welcome! I’m glad you stopped by and will continue to do so. I just followed you on your blog.
      I appreciate the encouraging words. Boy, I sure need it. I must say that your comment about Newsom is spot-on. Music to my ears. I just have a feeling about him. He’s got charisma, and he’s a fighter. He never shies away from fighting the crazies. The more I see of him, the more I like his chances of being president someday.
      Will that day be in 2024? Hard to say. But I spend time on Twitter and Kamala Harris has quite the following there and in other circles. Some of them are saying she’s the most likely person to run. I’m just not so sure about her yet. I think Newsom’s political skills are better. What do you think?
      Btw, I really like Joe Biden. And I think he’s getting a bum rap for a lot of the crap that’s going on. But, I agree with you that he really is just a placeholder. I do not want him to run in 2024. I actually do not think he will run. He just can’t say that. I think he’ll announce he’s not running, sometime in mid to late 2023. I might be wrong. I don’t think I am though. Then, we can have an honest debate as to who should be the heir apparent candidate in’24.
      Again, welcome aboard! Hope to hear from you more in the future.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. “I think Newsom’s political skills are better (than Harris).”
        Absolutely. Newsom is the consummate politician and I mean that in the best way. I’m certain that he’s driven by power but I’m pretty darn certain that he’s also driven by a duty to do the right thing.
        “He’s (Newsom) got charisma, and he’s a fighter.”
        I don’t if you recall but in 2004, Newsom bucked the whole nation and, as mayor of San Francisco, ordered the city to start issuing licenses for gay marriage.
        Just recently he’s announced that California will begin producing insulin and selling it below market value. I’m not sure how it’s going to be pulled off but he’s DOING things and not just flapping his jaws.
        Right now Newsom says he’s not running, but he might just be playing politics.

        “ Btw, I really like Joe Biden. And I think he’s getting a bum rap for a lot of the crap that’s going on.”
        I’m really conflicted about Biden. Clearly he was dealt a bad hand and he has to do the best with what he has.

        To be honest, I haven’t been overly impressed with any president since LBJ. He just screwed up, and badly so, with Vietnam. For me every president since has shown some measures of mediocrity, or downright incompetence (Bush and Trump) or lack of basic morality (Ronnie Rayguns. I liked Obama – a lot. He had/has all of the qualities to be an exceptional president. Maybe more experience in the Senate and a lot less of Mitch McConnell (who will go down in history as one of the worst Senate Majority Leaders).

        Liked by 1 person

      2. It will be very interesting, Paul, to see what Newsom does. As for the insulin issue, yes, a very bold thing for him to do. And you can contrast that with the complete idiocy of Republican governors like Stitt of Oklahoma, who is launching an investigation into critical race theory allegations. You cannot make this stuff up.

        Like

  5. I better not comment because I feel exactly as you do…I’m old and I’m glad…
    But I will tell you I try to look at the long view…by long, I mean 30/50 years or longer, from now. I’ll be dead but either things will have swung back to a liberal progressive kinder society not based on greed and religion or we will be some large 3rd world country riddled with religious nuts, poverty, even higher crime, disease, even poorer, if any education and and no voice anymore as in voting. We will be like some of the Mideast..a few super wealthy king like leaders and the rest poor ignorant unhealthy conspiracy theory and religious nuttery laden ideologies.

    Then again climate change will make it all a moot point.
    And I guess I commented after all.😊

    Liked by 5 people

    1. Thanks, as always Mary, for your thoughtful comments. You speak the truth. I cannot disagree with any of it. We are, without a doubt, at a precipice in our history. Perhaps not since the Civil War have we been so dangerously close to losing what we all took for granted not so long ago. I hope we end up like your very optimistic vision. Sadly, it seems we’re much closer to the other one. Democrats are our only hope for a better future. And, unfortunately, I’m not inspired by that fact. We need fighters, and I just don’t see enough of them. Perhaps someone will emerge. Otherwise, the crazies will win. I don’t want to think about that….

      Liked by 3 people

      1. My greatest fear is it will be DeSantis. Nov 22 will be the telling point.

        Liked by 2 people

      2. That guy! Ughhh. I agree. I shudder to think of him being in charge some day. Let’s hope to hell that never happens

        Liked by 2 people

  6. You’re not wrong in having the pessimism, and I do agree with where you are coming from. It does feel like a losing fight right now. However, the optimist inside of me wants to tell you to stand up taller and don’t succumb to the detriment that Orange #45 worked hard to create. As democracy is in jeopardy, we should fight harder, even if there is a chance we will lose. Then you can say that you didn’t give up and give in, and you will feel better about being pessimistic. It’s weird to say it that way, and I am sorry that you have been through so much.

    Voting is how we beat the other side, and the act of getting louder than the masses controlling our destinies is the other way we beat them. The hearings of Jan. 6 has thrown a wrench in a lot of plans and agendas. We have been here before in our history books. Let’s beat them at their own game.

    Liked by 6 people

    1. Thanks so much Amy. I need that optimism. And, I will not give up. It’s too damn important, and people like you and me care about what happens to this country. I will never stop caring. It’s not in my nature. So, the struggle continues. My hope is that with the recent Supreme Court decisions, the electorate will show up in droves. It’s the only way the progressive side can win. Massive turnout. Because we know damn well the crazies will turn out. They are just as equally motivated to throw us back to a time none of us want to go back to. I appreciate the pep talk and good on you for the positivity! I certainly need some right now

      Liked by 2 people

      1. You’re welcome! I try to keep up the optimism to keep from breaking down myself and by hoping that it will spread to others one person at a time. I think people are becoming aware, and I know there are still so many that fell in line with the brainwashing of MAGA. It was basically David Koresh meets Charles Manson for a good while, and it takes a while to heal that kind of control over people.

        I’m glad that I found your page, and it’s a pleasure conversating with you 🙂

        Liked by 2 people

      2. I’m glad you found us too! And your comparison is very apt. Manson and Koresh. Yes, the blind dedication to a dangerous and narcissistic madman will not turn out well. So many of these folks simply do not have a clue as to what’s going on in the real world. January 6 means nothing to them. They’re more concerned with BLM and Critical race theory. You cannot reach these folks. It’s very unfortunate.

        Liked by 3 people

      3. It makes you wonder what it will take for them to come back to reality. My idea is that we have to give them a candidate that less people hate. I don’t know who that is yet, but I am working on it 🙂 There will be civil wars to come, but I feel like they will be necessary again.

        Liked by 1 person

  7. Well, thus far the comments haven’t been exactly uplifting … largely because all you say is right. BUT, Partner, I’m not about to let you slink into some dark place or turn away in disgust and lose yourself in the depths of despair! NO! Yes, things are beyond bad in this country, but not hopelessly so … unless we all give up, throw our hands up and say, “Okay, you win … I’ll just go play Solitaire now.”

    Now, I don’t have any words of wisdom … just in case you were waiting for some. All I know is that if we give up the fight, then we lose for sure. Nan is right that the Democrats seem lackluster, as if perhaps they’ve already given up … with a few exceptions. Think of Stacey Abrams who stands a real chance to beat Kemp in November. And Val Demings in Florida. We cannot stop now, Partner! Let’s find something to work together on when you feel up to it … and by the way, I AM truly sorry you caught Covid, but glad that you’re getting over it and that your wife is okay.

    Believe me, I understand the angst and go through it at least 2-3 times a week, but … let’s not give up yet … please? 🥺 Sending you big hugs, my friend and writing partner!

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Thanks, as always Jill. You know I value your wisdom on everything that’s going on in our world. Nobody understands it better than you. And no, I’m not giving up. I simply cannot as it is not in my nature. Yes, It’s a struggle right now. But, this too shall pass. We simply cannot let the lunatics win. They’ve rigged it pretty damn good though, haven’t they? It’s gonna take a lot of toughness and perseverance in order to get through this. But, I know you’re there fighting the good fight every day. It’s an inspiration partner. And yes, I’d love to do another project at some point. Perhaps closer to the mid-terms? We shall see. Thanks again Jill for the words of encouragement. Damn. I sure need it.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. We’ll stay in touch, my friend, and soon we’ll come up with a good idea to collaborate on … there’s just too much to take in right now, I think. Keep well, dear friend … the world hasn’t ended yet, and we’re gonna do our part to try to ensure it doesn’t anytime soon!

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Yes we will!

        Liked by 1 person

  8. I would try but my usual positive outlook is receding too

    Sent from my iPhone

    >

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Yes, it’s very unfortunate. I will crawl out of this hole at some point. And hopefully you’ll crawl out of it too. It’s just too damn important to throw in the towel.

      Liked by 2 people

  9. My friend, I, too, am very near a point of utter despair. I try to persuade my Trumpist friends. “Just look at the overwhelming evidence of corruption within the Trump administration specifically and within the Republican Party generally as presented in the January 6th hearings,” I say to them. Their response? “I will not watch that witch hunt.” What can we do when a third of the country has completely lost any grip on reality and refuses to listen to any reason? What can we do when another third of the nation fiddles while our nation burns? As I wrote in my most recent Grumpy’s Grumblings post,
    “So, it’s too late now for the cult’s zealous followers to abandon or turn on their messiah. They must remain firm in their convictions. And if that means burying their heads in the sand as almost daily new revelations emerge of their messiah’s turpitudes, particularly from the January 6th Subcommittee, then so be it. Sand-filled facial orifices are, apparently, a small price to pay for being able to blissfully ignore the step-by-step dismantling of our constitutionally protected form of government.”
    I assume I still have another 20 years left on this planet. So, I think I’m ready to just take an existential leap of faith and pretend all is fine so that I don’t curl up in a fetal ball while I await my final day.

    Liked by 5 people

    1. I think it becomes about they can’t let go of their ego by admitting they were conned. No one wants to look the fool.

      Liked by 3 people

      1. Definitely!

        Like

    2. Thanks Jerry. You have a unique perspective, coming from the evangelical community. I know you’re dumbfounded as to the complete complicity and acquiescence so many in that community have towards Trump. There is simply no changing any of them. And, the ones who aren’t necessarily evangelicals but are merely low information/unintelligent voters. I’m trying my best to keep my head above water. We’ve come through so much as a country in the past 246 years. Will it survive Trumpism? I’m not so sure. We shall find out very soon I’m afraid.

      Liked by 2 people

  10. Thanks Jeff. Democrats are lousy marketers. As an independent and former member of both parties, mostly Republican as an adult, Dems have a better story to tell on a lot of fronts, yet they let Republican marketers control the narrative. And, with opinion folks on Fox and even worse sources of information, the narrative can be hammered home.

    These marketers for the GOP search for and create wedge issues to discuss, which are usually blown out of proportion. But rather than talk about giving more money to rich people and helping them keep it, they make sure we talk about the wall, CRT, Replacement theory, the failed stimulus, failures of socialism in places like Venezuela and Cuba, et al. When someone genius said “Defund the police” that may have been the absolutely worst slogan ever.

    As Pulitzer Prize winner Thomas Friedman once said, “Donald Trump has no second paragraph.” He does not need one. Make him get past the bumper sticker slogans and name calling. Make Republicans explain why Republicans testifying under oath that the former president lied to them and had a heavy hand in the insurrection is not a concern.

    Conservative pundit Michael Gerson said the “Republican party is in decay.” He is right. That is a true bumper sticker from a very astute source.

    Dems are surprised we have a conservative SCOTUS. My answer is what did you think would happen? Trump put a roster of conservative judges he would choose from out in advance. He knew that was one of his few selling points.

    Dems need to vote. Dems need to make their concerns known as they did in the 2018 midterms. Otherwise, you will lose the majorities and may end up with a president worse than Trump – a competent bully. Keith

    Liked by 6 people

    1. Keith.
      I have been privileged to read more than a few exceptional posts and responses to other posts written by yourself. This one is there ranking as one of your best. A clarion call to the battered ranks of the Democrats, while a mature and incisive critique of the failure of its overall leader.
      If this dreadful state of affairs is turned around it will be thanks to the efforts and perceptions of folk such as yourself.
      Roger.

      Liked by 3 people

      1. Thanks Roger. I appreciate your reading and commenting. This is high praise given its source. Thanks, Keith

        Liked by 2 people

      2. Keep on keeping on and best wishes to all your endeavours Keith.

        Like

    2. Thanks Keith, for your usual wise and common sense approach to all of this. Boy you are so right when it comes to lack of marketing. Dems simply do not have the media infrastructure to compete with the loudmouths on the other side. It should be a slam dunk in November. But you and I know it won’t be. Anything can happen but I suspect the GOP will win back the House and Dems will keep the Senate. If that does happen, you will see any investigation into Trump cease and Hunter Biden’s laptop will be the new obsession. Every day.
      We either turn out and vote en masse, or we don’t. That’s the ballgame Keith. And control of Congress hangs in the balance.

      Liked by 3 people

      1. Jeff, I hope you are right on the Senate. We cannot forget the endless Benghazi hearings, which Kevin McCarthy told the truth about on air and had to withdraw his candidacy to replace John Boehner as Speaker. What did McCarthy say on air? That the hearings were designed to discredit Hillary Clinton as a candidate for president.

        I am grateful that former Trump Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney has written an op-ed telling Republicans to pay attention to the House Select Committee hearings as Republicans are testifying under oath about their concerns over Donald Trump. My blog yesterday cites this piece and as a link to the op-ed.

        Keith

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Yes, if they win either or both Houses of Congress, the likes of Jim Jordan, Matt Gaetz, and Marjorie Taylor Green will become the voices and faces of the GOP. God help us all.

        Like

  11. My dear blogger friend … how did you manage to get inside my head and write the exact words/feelings that I have? I’m originally from Puerto Rico but the American way was ingrained in my mind since my early years, many moons ago. I started really paying attention to politics after 2016.
    I can’t believe what I see … it definitely hurts my mind, my soul!! I had a mild moment of peace after the 2020 elections then Jan 6 happened!! I can’t see this going anywhere but down … and it’s stolen my peace again and it truly hurts!! I’m so sad, disheatened and disappointed. Thank you for this post … at least it validates what I’m seeing and shows me I am not alone!! From the heart … on another note – I too tested positive for COVID after being fully vaxxed and boosted!! All good now … ❤

    Liked by 4 people

    1. Thanks Dr. Rex. I’m glad you’re ok on the Covid front. It just goes to show you that this thing is not over. It’s still changing/mutating. I dropped my guard-stopped wearing masks etc..and I got it. Still don’t know from where. Oh well, we’re both good and that’s all that counts.
      Yes, I vented my feelings and I appreciate everyone weighing in. I think most are feeling a bit discouraged these days. I know I’ll break out of it at some point. But boy, can the news get any more bleak? Let’s keep our head up as best we can Dr. Rex and hope for better days ahead. That’s all we can do!

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Indeed!! 🙏🏽

        Like

  12. Firstly Jeff I am sorry Covid caught up with you, but glad you got the better of it. May your return to health continue.
    It grieves me to see my adopted nation brought so low by folk invoking forces of which they do not fully comprehend and in return some of those who oppose them feeling the fight is lost and it is time to steal away. And I wish there were constructive and upbeat words within me. Sadly, the shadows of our own collective European histories cloud my perspectives. Thus, stealing away is not a likely option available. Not in the long term.
    A group which does not embrace a middle ground emboldened by its successes will want more, irrespective of the risks involved. Thus, they will come for not just the minorities be they racial, religious or social. They will come for everyone. They will expect flags to be displayed. They will expect ‘you’ to keep ‘your’ women under control. They will hound and persecute without fear of law. They will in effect bring back the militia style rule of the KKK of the early 20th Century. Many will seek a ‘quiet life’, but it will be one under supervision.
    However, they will not have control over all of the US and there will be fault lines with tectonic tensions. As you have witnessed white extremists will carry out terrorist acts. Then there will be repercussions for groups on the Right are instrumental in the formation of groups on The Left and Minority Communities, starting as self-defence but will conduct their own terrorist acts. And so it begins, the spiral of violence. For you do not try and seize complete control over a five time-zone continental size nation with a history of democracy without a push back.
    I wish I had more comfortable words, but they are not afforded to my European vision. We have fought too long, too hard, too bitterly, often for futile reasons not to know what our children (The White American) is capable of.
    So, prove me wrong. Take up the struggle through the ballot, the courts, the streets, the civil disobedience. Seize the narrative, spread the word that unless the USA steps back it will face, at least a Northern Ireland writ large, at worst a Lebanon /Iraq / Libya. And yes, it can happen. No nation is immune.
    And raise the spectre of this possibility. If you have to scare people into action. Tell them to shake their elected officials into stopping this slide.
    Sorry my reply has to be like this Jeff. Like some ragged, wide-eyed, raw-boned would-be prophet.
    Prove me wrong folks. Prove me wrong.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Thank you Roger for the kind words and well wishes.
      And thanks for your usual wise advice and historical perspective. I agree with all of it, especially, “Northern Ireland writ large, at worst a Lebanon/Iraq/Libya.” I think that’s where we’re headed Roger. I want to prove you wrong, but I simply cannot at this point. Let’s see where we are after our 2022 election. I’m not very optimistic about it but maybe the country will surprise us. I hope so.
      On a final note, what I find very interesting is the stepping down of Boris Johnson. No, not that he stepped down. But how even he eventually did what was right because it was best for the country. I find that refreshing. Imagine if Donald Trump did what all of his predecessors had done-simply concede the election. There would have been no January 6. And we could have moved on as a country. Well, we know what happened. If only Trump had been more like Johnson-in this regard at least. What do you think Roger?

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Here’s to being pleasantly surprised Jeff. Maybe folk will eventually take the cotton wool out of their ears and listen to the alarm bells.
        Actually Jeff the Johnson saga ran like a Shakespearean tragedy or Tennessee Williams play; take your pick.
        There was one scandal too many. In this case appointing a known sexual predator to a position of authority, then either denying or ‘forgetting’ he knew of the man’s record. This was another case of Johnson not caring for rules and regulations when they applied to him or those he appointed. What added fuel was that government minsters were sent out to make public statements defending him when they had been given false information. This started a landslide of resignations from the UK ministerial ranks (UK governments are complex things either like jigsaws, Lego buildings or a house of cards depending on the situation). Despite a number of previous indicators by which a PM should have packed up weeks ago, Johnson clung on, claiming he had a mandate (actually he didn’t; The Conservative Party did- big difference). Eventually with no talent left to call on to staff the government and folk telling him he should go, he was crow-barred out. Even then he did not go at once but is arguably staying on until a new leader is found (another contentious step).
        Commentators here have actually been likening Johnson’s actions to Trump’s in so far as denying the obvious. By good fortune Johnson’s support base in the public is not as proportionally widespread nor is its ranks heavy with hysterical conspiracy junkies. His demise was more like a very British version of the film ‘Downfall’.
        Thus Jeff, he did not go for the good of the nation, he had to go because he could not govern as a PM. Johnson’s integrity and sense of duty are far outweighed by his sense of self-importance and eye for the money. He will retire form the front of UK politics, maybe plan a comeback or equally possible write his account of things, find himself a cosey column or two in newspapers and various other ways to make money by staying in the public view, which will be very irritating for a large portion of the UK (Actually in 2019 on the mainland, England, Scotland and Wales less folk voted the Conservatives than the other parties combined).
        From here on in the future is uncertain though, once more in a British way.

        Liked by 3 people

      2. You’ve explained it Roger, as only you could do. I get it. He’s no hero, that’s for sure. I am heartened, though, that so many people did resign. They basically forced him to go, which is, in my view, honorable. If only some of the folks over here had done more than simply wait till they could get book deals rather than tell the public what a lunatic Trump was. It’s amazing how some of them, for example former Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, have come around to say he was dangerous. For God sakes, the man worked in the White House for a long time. He knew what was going on. Yet, he sat on his hands and predicted that Trump would gracefully accept defeat. Well, we all know THAT did not happen.

        The complicity. The sycophancy. The enabling. It’s all quite troubling, Roger. So much could have been done to prevent Jan 6 from ever happening. The real question now of course, is whether we have the guts to charge an ex-president with crimes. I’m not hopeful. Thanks again Roger for all your wisdom.

        Liked by 2 people

      3. Thank you for your kind words Jeff, although I can’t claim wisdom; more of a case; to use british vernacular and in one of the many London accents:
        ‘It’s bleedin’ obvious! Inn’ it?’

        When comparing Watergate with Trump’s antics in 2019-2020 and the results the latter says more about the mindset of a portion of the USA population. Nixon still had his supporters at the end but they accepted the way the die had rolled and ended up. The Cult of Denial and Outrage and not winning is degrading as well as dangerous. They resemble a slightly diluted Taliban or ISIS.
        And a very grim desperate argument for the usefulness of an authoritarian Stalinist or Bejing style government to sort them out, which quite frankly is no more than they deserve.
        We keep on hoping for sanity to return and better times.

        Liked by 3 people

      4. Sanity. Sigh. In such short supply these days!

        Liked by 2 people

      5. Perhaps Jeff there is a finite supply of sanity and with the increase in global population it’s spreading thin.
        Though that doesn’t fully answer why tens of millions of americans believe in qanon, tRump, that the last presidential was rigged, and currently elected officials can make looney tunes statements and still stay in office.
        I need more on research my idea.🤔

        Liked by 2 people

  13. Sadly, I share the same sorrow. Some thng posive… we are learning that takng today’s middle road is really hurting us. Can the filibuster! Pack the Supreme Court. Listen to the progressives!!!

    Liked by 2 people

    1. 100% Don!

      Liked by 1 person

  14. Hello Jeff. Most of what can be added to the conversation has been except that our current Democratic party leaders including Biden seem to want / think they are living in the 1980s where the political parties tried to work things out with each other. Where they would spend time with each other and work things out, give and take. They would compromise. That is the time frame Biden, Schumer, and Pelosi seem to think they are living in. They need to wake up. Biden keeps trying to find common ground with McConnell to the point where he was willing to put a hard far right anti-choice judge on a lifetime federal bench if McConnell would promise to let more of his nominees be approved faster. WTF. Current republican party thinks compromise means they get everything they want, and the democrats apologize for not giving in sooner. During TFGs term Schumer kept making deals to simply not object to his nominees without getting anything in response but early recesses. Pelosi keeps going on interviews saying we need a strong Republican party. What side does she work for? You never hear McCarthy saying they need a strong Democratic party? These people need to step aside and let the younger generations who understand the public is tired of spending all their life trying to survive while the upper incomes enjoy unheard of luxuries. The US people want what people in other countries have, a higher quality of life and a government that works for the people. Let the democratic leaders not so enamored of corporate money lead for a change. People are tired of voting for parties that work against them. Hugs

    Liked by 4 people

    1. I cannot disagree with anything you say say Scottie. It’s time for a new generation indeed. I’m pretty sure Biden is not running again even though he says he is. He has to say that. Undoubtedly that will leave the door open to someone younger. You simply cannot treat this version of the Republican Party like the days of yesteryear. Those times are long gone. These are the fascists and authoritarians and we must keep them from the levers of power. It’s a tough task but damn it, we’re teetering so close to the edge of losing it all. You cannot negotiate with these folks.

      Liked by 2 people

  15. I understand the pessimism. However, I’ll leave you with this view…

    Every 50-60 years since this country was founded, we’ve gone through some type of upheaval or war. When you set it out on a timeline, there’s the Revolutionary War, the War of 1812, and then the Civil War. Those roughly fit that time spacing.

    After that, the internal wars ended, and things shifted towards social upheaval. There’s the Red Summer of 1918 and the early Jim Crow violence followed by the 1960s Civil Rights Era. We’re now sitting within that 50-60 year window. This is just our time to deal with dragging the backwards thinking folks along into the next Era. Their gains, while outwardly menacing, will not be permanent.

    America cannot fail now, especially since we would pretty much take the world with us because of the intertwined world economics. We just need to take a second, wipe our brows, roll up our sleeves, and bend the moral arc of justice towards good.

    Liked by 4 people

    1. Well said!
      I wish to be proven wrong in my gloomy assessments.

      Like

  16. the supreme court just gave the abortion deal back to the states so all of you nuts whining about how they’re going to take us back to the 1850’s are mentally deranged. I guess the 10th amendment doesn’t mean shit to you people/

    Like

    1. Hello Scott. You seem to have missed the 9th amendment. It says just because a right is not specified in the constitution doesn’t mean the people don’t have it. It says that the constitution really doesn’t have to list all the rights that people have.

      The Ninth Amendment of the United States Constitution states that the federal government doesn’t own the rights that are not listed in the Constitution, instead, they belong to the people. The 9th Amendment states that the rights not specified in the Constitution belong to the people, not the federal government.

      https://constitutionus.com/constitution/amendments/the-9th-amendment-to-the-united-states-constitution-explained/#:~:text=The%20Ninth%20Amendment%20of%20the,people%2C%20not%20the%20federal%20government. Please try to reason things out before calling names. Thanks. Hugs

      Liked by 1 person

  17. The anti-life Roe vs Wade protesters fizzled out in a week – abortion is just another losing issue for Democrats hyped by their communist media propagandists.

    Like

    1. So nice to hear from you Scott. I’ve missed your reasoned and well-sourced commentary.

      Liked by 1 person

  18. […] the heels of my last post, which was on the dark and pessimistic side, I’d like to head in the opposite direction. And, […]

    Like

  19. Monday, 10 July

    Hi, Jeff–

    Hope to catch up with you Guys in your most recent post, to update latest news regarding Medicare drug pricing reform proposal.

    By the way, very sorry to hear that you fell ill with Covid. Hope you’ve fully recovered by now, and don’t have any lingering problems or symptoms that are associated with “Long Covid” (I think that’s the correct term). Fingers crossed–so far, Mr Blue and I have avoided it. Of course, we’ve continued to live in a relatively isolated bubble–still have “contactless” deliveries of groceries, etc. This area consistently has a high “infectivity rate.”

    Thank goodness, our Golden’s surgery went very well. For her sake, we had to keep her in medical boarding status for 3 weeks (IOW, until the incision was pretty much healed). She’s a very bright dog, but, also, super reactive. So, she needed to be under 24/7 supervision, in case she decided to chew up her “cone” in order to get at her belly/stitches.

    Take care.

    Blue

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks for the well wishes Blue, and good hearing from you. Yeah, I’m recovered from Covid. It seems like everyone is getting it these days. This version is very contagious. Obviously. Luckily I’m vaxxed and I think it helped in the fact my bout wasn’t that severe. Glad to hear your Golden is doing well. We’ve got to keep them around as long as we can! They’re as much a part of the family as any human being!

      Liked by 1 person

  20. Neil Rickert, Brookingslib and Nan, democrats and republicans have differing political labels, however, there is really no difference between them otherwise.

    Like

    1. Hello ragnarsbhut. If you really think that is true I suggest you look at the voting records of both the federal House and Senate. Compare what the democrats managed to pass with little or no supports from republicans. Compare that to when republicans held the Presidency while controlling the House and Senate. The democrats passed the original child tax credit lifting millions of children from poverty, the republicans killed it. The democrats passed civil rights legislation, infrastructure funding, increased funding for veterans of 5.9%, again with no republican help, increased funding for police with no help from republicans. I could go on, but let’s look at what legislation the republicans passed when they were in charge of the government. Tax cuts for the wealthy that added over 2.2 trillion to the federal debt. I would say there is a big difference between the parties and who the parties are trying to help, who they are working for. Again check the voting record not the rhetoric as the rhetoric will say one thing but the votes tell you what they really support. Hugs

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Scottie, the democrats also had a reputation of being the pro-slavery Party, as well as that of the KKK.

        Like

      2. In 1965, LBJ, with large majorities in the House and Senate, passed the Civil Rights Act. He knew then, that the South would be lost for generations for Democrats. And he was right. The Republican Party is now the home for racists, bigots, conspiracy theorists, white supremacists, and insurrectionists. Yes, Democrats had their share of those types of people back then. The script has switched. Maybe you should put some context into your comments? You’re aware of that history, right?

        Liked by 2 people

      3. Brookingslib, the Republican Party is not the KKK Party, nor the Jim Crow Party, definitely not the party of slavery. All of those traits fit the Democratic Party.

        Like

      4. Please tell me something the Republican Party has done in the past 5 decades to help working people. I’ll wait. And please do not tell me about tax cuts for billionaires.

        Liked by 2 people

      5. Brookingslib, welfare reform is an example. Are you familiar with the Contract with America that was supported by Newt Gingrich?

        Like

      6. Yes. I’m aware of it. How does welfare reform help working men and women in this country? I’m talking specific policies like minimum wage, the earned income tax credit, the right to form unions, workplace safety, retirement security etc…Most of those issues are Democratic issues although the EITC has been supported by some R’s in the past. Bottom line: R’s are basically against anything that might benefit struggling working people. They’re more than happy to roll over for corporations and billionaires, though. They want no reform of our campaign finance system. They do not want people to vote-at least those who are not white, that is. They’re basically NO on everything except trillions in tax cuts. Why would anyone other than the rich, vote for such a pathetic party?

        Liked by 3 people

      7. Welfare should be for people who are on hard times. People who are capable of working but choose not to are just turning that into a career opportunity where they get money for doing nothing.

        Like

      8. Good lord! I’ve heard that idea spouted as far back as I can remember (and that’s a looong time!). Yet NO ONE has been able to identify the people who fit this description. It’s all rhetoric to support a political belief.

        Liked by 2 people

      9. Nan, I have seen videos where people who are clearly able to work stand on street corners with signs advertising hardship who definitely do not appear to be starving. People who can find time to do stuff like that can find time to try to find work.

        Liked by 1 person

      10. You have no right to pass judgment. You don’t know their history or their circumstances. They may or may NOT be able to work, but it’s not for you or anyone else to make that determination without knowing the facts. Further, a person’s physical appearance can be very deceiving.

        Liked by 3 people

      11. Nan, your last statement is the most correct in your whole response.

        Like

      12. I agree with Nan in her assessment of your talking point, which has been the same talking point Republicans have used for decades. It’s always about scapegoating people and demonizing them to the point where people end up hating one another because of it. Shame on you and shame on the GOP for continuing to foment division in our country. When is it going to stop?

        Liked by 3 people

      13. Brookingslib, it will stop when elected representatives do the work of the people, not pandering solely to their voter base.

        Like

      14. Hello ragnarsbhut. This is an interesting observation you have, but it doesn’t hold up to facts. Those facts are such pesky thing. I am disabled! Just so you know the first time my VA doctor told me I was being put in a wheelchair I had to file forms for disability. The first couple times it was denied, even though it was pushed by the VA. But then I got a lawyer, and within a short period of time I got my disability approved. My lawyer got his share of the back money a month before I did. That was 1997.

        In 2010 I did one of the stupidest things I have ever done in my life, I fought to give up my disability payments and go back to work. I was so sure I could do it. I lasted about 3 years plus until in the hospital my doctors told me I would have to stop working or die. They refused to sign off on me going back to work.

        So in 2014 after leaving a job I really wanted to do, I applied for Social Security disability. Again! I was already in the system with all my medical records as having the medical problems I have. Do you wonder how long it took to get back? It was a long time. It was not until 2017 after my spouse and I had to declare bankruptcy due to my medical bills. Then to get my disability back we had to go before a disability court hearing before a judge who asked a “work provider” if he could find a job for me anywhere in the area even for less than 20 hours a week which of course wouldn’t pay a living amount to live. The guy looked over at me and told the judge there was nowhere I could work with the physical disabilities I have, and1 no employer would hire me.

        With my personal story I am trying to tell you the idea that people are getting disability and getting over on the system is not true. But say it is. Say a small percentage of the population is getting a payment of $500 to about $1800 a month off the US government. What is that really in comparison to the 336 million people in the US? We just gave another 46 billion to the defense budget over last year’s 800 plus billion. So I looked it up. 7,638 is the number that comes back in the US on disability. The average check is $1,358. That includes by the way people like the young people’s whose family members died in the military. Do you wish to deny them that small amount of money a month for their family’s death?

        See what I am trying so hard to show you and ask you is to look beyond the videos of the right wing you watch. They have no reason to tell you the truth. Look to things that are facts that cannot be slanted. Like I did with the people on disability and how much they make. It is a pittance in the US. I have missed your comments on my blog and I can only think it is because I kept replying to you with facts that disproved your right wing world view. Anyway I look forward to talking with you more.

        But I would ask you what the harm is in giving money to poor people, even if they could work? Well they would spend it, right? What would they spend it on? Food, medical expenses, rent for a place to live, everything that would put that money back into the economy. The economy is the flow of money when people buy and sell. So giving money to those people that may not deserve it … improves the economy when they spend that money. But ..

        When you give money to wealthy people what do they do with it? Do they spend it increasing the money flow in the economy? Nope! They invest or save it. That takes it out of the money flow. That makes everyone including the country they are in weaker because the money they had is now tied up. Again I ask you to google this to understand I am telling you the truth. Hugs and really I care. Bye.

        Liked by 3 people

      15. Excellent, Scottie!

        Liked by 2 people

      16. Scottie, I agree with you on this.

        Liked by 1 person

      17. Hi Scottie. Thanks so much for sharing your story on our blog. I really appreciate the facts and deep explanation of this issue. For some reason, many who come from the right side of the political spectrum have a problem with those who do not work. They label everyone as lazy, leeching off the government, etc..In many ways it’s as simple as having a lack of empathy. They just don’t care. It’s hooray for me and the hell with everyone else. You know, “I pulled myself up from the bootstraps, why can’t you?” It’s that kind of mentality and an aversion to anyone who is not the same race as them. Unfortunately, it’s not getting any better. In fact, it’s gotten worse in many regards.
        Anyway, happy holidays to you and your family and thanks, as always, for participating over here. It’s greatly appreciated.

        Liked by 1 person

      18. Thanks for providing the facts Scottie. Sometimes they are an inconvenient truth to a certain segment of the electorate.

        Liked by 2 people

  21. Brookingslib, I have seen enough videos where people who panhandle look like they are perfectly capable of working. Mental health problems or other disabling conditions aside, all of the people I have seen don’t have to be in their situations. That is solely by their choice.

    Like

    1. Hello ragnarsbhut. Sorry to tell you that the people who panhandle are not the people on disability. Oh some of them may look fit, but again … those are not the majority of people on disability. It is people like me! It is military vets! You have seen videos from where? I bet it was from right wing media that wanted you to think half the population (all which were democrats) were living off the government treasury. Oh the government spending on those people, we could be so free if it was not for those people taking all the money. Yet look at the real spending. Do you wonder why it costs you to go to the doctor? People in Israel can do it for free. Oh ya we provided them with money. Other developed countries do this for their people but the US, which is called the wealthiest country on earth cannot due to … profit is king. Companies and people must make the most profit possible no matter who it hurts. Hugs

      Liked by 3 people

      1. Scottie, even with Medicare For All, assuming that comes to pass, an MD would still get a good salary.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Hello ragnarsbhu. Yes doctors would, and more hospitals in smaller rural areas would have a steady payment source to help them stay open. But it is the obscene need to make profit for the companies that own the hospitals and doctors’ offices. It is no longer true that most doctors own their own practice these days. Most have sold themselves to companies that deal with all the administrative issues and costs. Hospitals are being merged and bought up by large companies that require profits over service to the community. The days of the local community hospital are almost over and gone. In the US healthcare and medication has become a for profit industry. Somethings shouldn’t be profit driven. Healthcare is a necessary must have for people, which means it should be a service the government provides just like the other must have services for the public. Hugs

        Liked by 2 people

      3. Scottie, I agree with you.

        Liked by 1 person

    2. You have no idea what any of these people are dealing with. It’s your own personal opinion, which you’re entitled to.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Brookingslib, mental health problems and substance abuse issues are 2 problems that come to mind. People who fake their situations are also out there.

        Like

      2. People who fake their situations are also out there.

        I’d be interested in statistics. Do you have any?

        Like

      3. Nan, 44% of panhandlers admit using part of their daily take on drugs or alcohol at least once per week. Up to 80% of panhandlers have spent time inside of a jail and more than 20% have likely spent at least one stint in a state prison. 58% have been panhandling for at least five years. Some people were offered jobs and many refused, as is indicated in A John Stossel segment titled Freeloaders: Panhandling had multiple people engaging in it. John Stossel offered jobs to people and only one showed up to do it. Either these people have homes to go to and just stand on corners to scam unsuspecting people or they may have family who can help them but they just decide to stand on corners holding signs to dupe people.

        Like

      4. And this (conservatively slanted) TV show gives you all the proof/statistics that you need to make the claims you do, yes?

        Liked by 1 person

      5. Nan, if someone held up a sign that says, “Why lie? I just want a beer or a cigarette,” at least that person is being honest.

        Like

      6. Hello ragnarsbhut. There is a cycle homelessness can cause. If you don’t have a set address most employers wouldn’t hire you. If you have been in prison the stigma makes getting a job very hard, and if you are so poor or for reasons don’t have a cell phone you again will find it hard to get hired. There are working people who can no longer afford housing who lose their jobs due to trying to live out of their car or such things, once the job is gone so is the income, most possessions, and without some kind of major assistance it horrible difficult if not impossible to get out of that situation. Most homeless have repeated jail stays because being homeless itself is almost a crime and the more desperate people get the more crime they will commit to find the things they need to live. If you are starving you will steal food to live.

        Other countries and some states have found solutions that do cost money to implement but compared to the drop in arrests / crime it is worth it, not to mention worth it in just the return of human dignity to these people. Things like universal basic income keeps people with the minimums to have food and lodging. In 1980 to save the government money Ronald Reagan closed the mental health institutions, we need to return to funding these places / mental health centers so that people with mental / emotional issues don’t just get tossed in jail as the way to handle them. In some places local governments have provided small living units for the homeless as a way to get them back into society and it is working. But again it costs money. So less tax breaks for the wealthy so more money can go to the poor. Hugs

        Liked by 2 people

      7. Scottie, many people have lost jobs due to refusal of vaccines. Insofar as I am concerned, not only is this a HIPAA violation, it could also be a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, assuming a person has a disability but can still work and is just plain harassment.

        Like

      8. Hello ragnarsbhut. Sorry but you are incorrect about HIPAA and it being a violation of the ADA. I worked in ICUs so understand I know what HIPPA is as I had extensive training in it. HIPAA covers your medical providers / caregivers from giving out your medical information unless you sign a form authorizing it. Your doctor, nurse, or anyone connected with your care or your medications cannot disclose anything about your health or treatment without your consent. But everyone else can! HIPAA covers medical providers care givers only! If I know something about your medical history and I am not a medical provider or your caregiver it is perfectly legal for me to say it to anyone, I could do a blog post on it. If I know you are unvaccinated or have an STD I can freely talk about it as I am no longer in the medical field, I never was your medical caregiver with access to your records so it is fully legal for me to talk about what you may or may not have.

        The ADA covers making businesses accessible for people with disabilities and requiring employers to not discriminate against employees with disabilities. It doesn’t cover or allow any worker to spread contagion among the other workers. No business is required to let one worker infect any other workers. Covid is a public health issue. It is easily spread simply by being near or around others who have it. Requiring the vaccines cuts down the risk your employees will get sick or seriously ill from contracting it. It is no different from employers requiring the yearly flu vaccine. Ill or sick employees cost businesses a lot of money, mitigating that is the right and in the case of a publicly traded business a requirement.

        I need a cane or a walker most of the time. Accommodating that disability doesn’t cause harm to anyone. If I have a highly communicable disease that is spread through breathing around me or for a time after I have been there it is harmful to others no business has to accommodate that. Hugs

        Liked by 1 person

      9. Scottie, you are wrong. According to Google.com, The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) is a federal law that required the creation of national standards to protect sensitive patient health information from being disclosed without the patient’s consent or knowledge. For the most part, the rule on patient privacy restricts the extent to which medical records can be shared without explicit consent. The HIPAA Privacy Rule gives patients and employees: The right to authorize disclosure of their health records. HIPAA violations are related to accessing or sharing patients’ protected health information (PHI.) Medical records themselves cannot be demanded as a condition of employment.

        Like

      10. That’s what he wrote, Rag …

        Liked by 1 person

      11. Nan, if I volunteer of my own volition private medical information before applying for a specific job, that is on me. Here is the exact quote: “Scottie, you are wrong. According to Google.com, The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) is a federal law that required the creation of national standards to protect sensitive patient health information from being disclosed without the patient’s consent or knowledge. For the most part, the rule on patient privacy restricts the extent to which medical records can be shared without explicit consent. The HIPAA Privacy Rule gives patients and employees: The right to authorize disclosure of their health records. HIPAA violations are related to accessing or sharing patients’ protected health information (PHI.) Medical records themselves cannot be demanded as a condition of employment. Try reading it for the full context.

        Like

      12. Hello Ragnarbhut. Actually Nan is correct. I wrote this last night in reply to your misinformation, but it had two links so was stuck in moderation. I took the links out and am going to repost it.

        Hello ragnarsbhut. I love it, you made the big google mistake of googling the wrong question and then use the results to bolster your position. 😂🤣😁😘

        Did you miss the part that I was a medical professional and a caregiver? You googled HIPAA and got the easy to read / understand version. You should have googled who is governed by HIPAA. Or covered entities. Anyway here is some new information the right wing media won’t tell you. Hugs

        Covered entities are defined in the HIPAA rules as (1) health plans, (2) health care clearinghouses, and (3) health care providers who electronically transmit any health information in connection with transactions for which HHS has adopted standards. For example, hospitals, academic medical centers, physicians, and other health care providers who electronically transmit claims transaction information directly or through an intermediary to a health plan are covered entities.

        In the context of answering the question is gossip a HIPAA violation, one might automatically assume that releasing details about an individual into the public domain is a disclosure not permitted by the Privacy Rule and is therefore a violation of HIPAA, but that is not necessarily true. In order to be a violation of HIPAA:

        The gossip has to be spread by an individual governed by the HIPAA Privacy Rule,
        The gossip has to be about a patient who has rights under the HIPAA Privacy Rule, and
        The gossip has to contain at least one identifier that make health information PHI.
        Generally speaking, an “individual governed by the HIPAA Privacy Rule” is a member of a Covered Entity´s or Business Associate´s workforce – workforce being defined as “employees, volunteers, trainees, and other persons whose conduct, in the performance of work for a Covered Entity or Business Associate, is under the direct control of such Covered Entity or Business Associate, whether or not they are paid by the Covered Entity or Business Associate”.

        Therefore, if an individual who is not “under the direct control” of a Covered Entity or Business Associate gossips about a patient, it is not a violation of HIPAA. Similarly, if the subject of the gossip is not a patient who has rights under the HIPAA Privacy Rule, the gossip is not a violation of HIPAA; and, even if the individual is an employee of a Covered Entity and the gossip relates to a patient in their care, gossip is not a violation of HIPAA if no identifiers are disclosed.

        Liked by 1 person

      13. Scottie, this is true. A question for you: Assuming that my position is right, at least in the sense that nobody can be legally required to have to share private medical information as a condition of employment, would it not be considered as harassment for the employer(s) to pry into what is by definition personal business?

        Like

      14. Hello Ragnarsbhut. No. First you are not right which you can find out on your own as to what entities are bound or controlled by HIPAA, but your employer not only has the right to demand information from you to make sure you are qualified and able to do your job. The employer more than likely has other employees to protect and Covid is a highly contagious virus. The employer may offer health insurance that they pay part of and sick employees will raise the costs of that insurance. The employer may require the employee to interact with other companies that require vaccinations at their offices or in meetings. Also if you are near a border, other countries like Canada require a vaccine to enter.

        As always when I want the full verified information, I google it and check the source. I got this from a New Hampshire employees’ rights group. If the group that protects workers rights says the employer legally can ask and make you provide proof, I would believe them. I will try to break up the link below so it doesn’t get stuck in moderation. Hugs

        Can My Employer Ask About My COVID-19 Vaccination Status?
        Yes. Disability discrimination is illegal so, in general, employers may not ask employees medical questions that might reveal the existence of a physical or mental disability. There are certain exceptions to this rule. Asking about an employee’s COVID-19 vaccination status is one of them. Discrimination laws do not prohibit employers from requiring all employees who physically enter the workplace to be vaccinated. It is not illegal for an employer to ask employees to provide documentation or other proof of vaccination. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has issued guidance the relationship between COVID-19 vaccination status and federal employment laws. The guidance can be viewed here.
        https://www.employeerightsgroup- newhampshire.com/is-my-employer- permitted-to-ask-questions- about-my-covid-19-vacc.html

        Liked by 1 person

      15. Scottie, that may technically be true now, however, a person’s private medical information is really nobody’s business but that person, that person’s family and the family MDs.

        Like

      16. Scottie, An employer can’t request medical information without a specific reason. If medical information is requested without a specific reason but as a means to find something to terminate an employee over, it may be a case of discrimination.

        Like

      17. Hello Ragnarsbhut. That is your opinion only. Both HIPAA and the ADA laws have exceptions. Such as the one for vaccines. Please understand you have been misinformed. From the government’s HHS web site. HHS stands for Health and Human Services. I broke the link up to get it to post, put it back together, remember that official government websites end with.gov Hugs

        Your employer can ask you for a doctor’s note or other health information if they need the information for sick leave, workers’ compensation, wellness programs, or health insurance.

        However, if your employer asks your health care provider directly for information about you, your provider cannot give your employer the information without your authorization unless other laws require them to do so.

        Generally, the Privacy Rule applies to the disclosures made by your health care provider, not the questions your employer may ask.

        http://www.hhs. gov/hipaa /for-individuals/employers- health-information-workplace/index.html #:~:text=Your%20employer%20can%20ask%20you,wellness%20programs%2C%20or%20health%20insurance.

        Liked by 1 person

      18. Hello ragnarsbhut. I love it, you made the big google mistake of googling the wrong question and then use the results to bolster your position. 😂🤣😁😘

        Did you miss the part that I was a medical professional and a caregiver? You googled HIPAA and got the easy to read / understand version. You should have googled who is governed by HIPAA. Or covered entities. Anyway here is some new information the right wing media won’t tell you. Hugs

        Covered entities are defined in the HIPAA rules as (1) health plans, (2) health care clearinghouses, and (3) health care providers who electronically transmit any health information in connection with transactions for which HHS has adopted standards. For example, hospitals, academic medical centers, physicians, and other health care providers who electronically transmit claims transaction information directly or through an intermediary to a health plan are covered entities. https://privacyruleandresearch.nih.gov/pr_06.asp#:~:text=Covered%20entities%20are%20defined%20in,which%20HHS%20has%20adopted%20standards.

        In the context of answering the question is gossip a HIPAA violation, one might automatically assume that releasing details about an individual into the public domain is a disclosure not permitted by the Privacy Rule and is therefore a violation of HIPAA, but that is not necessarily true. In order to be a violation of HIPAA:

        The gossip has to be spread by an individual governed by the HIPAA Privacy Rule,
        The gossip has to be about a patient who has rights under the HIPAA Privacy Rule, and
        The gossip has to contain at least one identifier that make health information PHI.
        Generally speaking, an “individual governed by the HIPAA Privacy Rule” is a member of a Covered Entity´s or Business Associate´s workforce – workforce being defined as “employees, volunteers, trainees, and other persons whose conduct, in the performance of work for a Covered Entity or Business Associate, is under the direct control of such Covered Entity or Business Associate, whether or not they are paid by the Covered Entity or Business Associate”.

        Therefore, if an individual who is not “under the direct control” of a Covered Entity or Business Associate gossips about a patient, it is not a violation of HIPAA. Similarly, if the subject of the gossip is not a patient who has rights under the HIPAA Privacy Rule, the gossip is not a violation of HIPAA; and, even if the individual is an employee of a Covered Entity and the gossip relates to a patient in their care, gossip is not a violation of HIPAA if no identifiers are disclosed.
        https://www.hipaajournal.com/is-gossip-a-hipaa-violation/

        Like

      19. More good points, Scottie. Good on you for pointing all of them out. When you think about it, you can put immigration kind of in the same category. The Republican Party will yell, scream, bitch, and moan about ‘illegal aliens’ and blame Democrats. But what is their solution, other than building a wall and refusing to let anyone in? There has to be a comprehensive solution to many of our problems. But, as the old saying goes, it takes two to tango. They would much rather demagogue groups of people, which is red meat for a pretty sizable amount of people in this country. It’s pathetic when you think about it.

        Liked by 2 people

      20. You’ve used Stossel’s ‘experiment’ before. That was from many years ago if I’m not mistaken. I’d use a different example if I were you. Homelessness is a complex issue that requires more than scapegoating and labeling all of them the same. People seem to fall through the cracks in the richest country on earth. Why is this so, Ragnar? Why doesn’t Europe have the same problem? At least not nearly as bad as us. Their safety net is much better. Homelessness is nothing like it is here. Healthcare is a right over there. Not here. Don’t you think this needs to change? Why is the Republican Party against anything that helps folks in need? Why so heartless? It appears they only care about one thing: power, and they’ll do just about anything to keep it. Maybe start putting some of the blame where it belongs?

        Liked by 2 people

      21. Brookingslib, maybe because the welfare state incentivizes this behavior.

        Like

      22. Hello ragnarsbhut. I really should let Jeff handle this but because that is a right wing talking point I would point out to you that you need to understand that the other advanced developed countries have much more government assistance to the public than the US. In other words what you call the welfare state is less in the US and more welfare for the people in those countries. That they don’t have our same issue to the extend we do should indicate we should look at doing what they do. However the wealthy business owners and the republican party have convinced a large part of our public that we are the greatest and always #1 in all things so the rest of the world should do what we do. That simply is not true. The US has become the king of capitalism where profit is god. But that means the government doesn’t help the public as the corporations need a desperate work force that will take any job at any low wage in any bad condition to maximize corporate profit. Hugs

        Liked by 2 people

      23. Hey Scottie, thanks for lending your expertise on a wide variety of issues. At some point, we must realize that convincing Ragnar of anything opposing his biased viewpoint is impossible. We know he’s against the vaccines. We know he thinks Fauci is a criminal. We know he thinks people begging for food and money are losers. We know he thinks welfare of any kind is bad. We know he equates pro-choice abortion folks to people who refuse the vaccine.
        In other words, I’ve said all I will say regarding Ragnar. I thank him for his participation. And I definitely thank you for taking the time to prove your points. To that end, let’s move on.

        Liked by 2 people

  22. Hello Brookingslib. A little while ago I left a reply for ragnarsbhut that included a couple of links so he would know I did not make the information up. It is in moderation because of the links. Thanks. Hugs

    Like

  23. Brookingslib, I am convinced that Covid is a problem. I am also convinced that we were lied to by most everybody about it, excluding MDs who study the effects of the vaccines.

    Like

    1. Wow! Who would have known you felt this way???!?!? 😲

      Liked by 3 people

      1. Nan, the sarcasm has been tried again and again, something that would be expected from a satirist or a comedian otherwise. Your persistent use of that tactic has been bordering on absurdity for a long time.

        Like

      2. Nevertheless, others enjoy it (even if you don’t).

        Liked by 2 people

      3. Nan, depending on the context, I don’t generally have an issue with it. A comedian with sarcasm in his or her style and presentation can be funny depending on the context. There was a comment I made on your blog where I inquired as to if your blog posting was done if you are sober. To be honest, I was being a smart-a** with that comment. Having said that, before that went down, I was not even remotely rude to you otherwise insofar as I know.

        Like

  24. I’m pretty right wing but i agree with most of that. We’re screwed if we start believing nutty conspiracy theories. The only thing i disagree on is Republicans going after transgender etc people with zeal. Their ideology and Pride has been shoved relentlessly in our faces the past couple of years to the point where you have to see it every day in the media or be expected to bow to it at work. These aren’t people just trying to go about their lives.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I completely agree with your last sentence!

      Liked by 1 person

    2. Thank you for weighing in Jessica. Boy, when I look back at that post I was in a pretty sour mood for sure. Not much has changed, really, other than the former president finally being held to account with 4 separate indictments. It’s hard to believe that the man may indeed, return to the WH, regardless of how he fares in his court cases.
      I think you’re spot on about the transgender issue. It’s just one of the many cultural battles we now see ourselves in on a daily basis. I wish the hate and vitriol would stop. But with social media now driving many of these divisions, and an ex-president sowing the seeds of distrust at every turn, I just don’t know how the situation is going to improve anytime soon.
      Thanks again, and I hope you stick around. I welcome opinions from the other side of the political spectrum, as long as it’s civil. I get a sense you are precisely that kind of person. Take care.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Dr. Rex Cancel reply

In CASE YOU MISSED IT