There’s so much at stake in this election. To say it’s the most important in our lifetime is not an understatement. There’s simply no adjective worthy enough to categorize what we’re facing on November 3, 2020. Life and death? Sure, that works. Look no further than Michelle Obama’s rallying cry from her speech at the Democratic Convention a few months ago: “Vote like your life depends on it.”

And it appears that voters in the United States of American are adhering to the former First Lady’s plea – in record numbers. We’re seeing people making their voices heard, loud and clear. That many are facing wait times in upwards of 10 hours, as was the case in Georgia a few days ago, underscores why we cannot take anything for granted anymore.

These voters are waiting in line because the people conducting the elections didn’t think you’d care enough to show up. They don’t believe you have the intestinal fortitude to wait for hours so that you can make your voice heard. If they put enough roadblocks in place, indeed staying home is the better option.

Or so they thought.

It’s inspiring to see this outpouring of civic engagement. But seeing the long lines also reminds us of the insidious nature of what’s going on. The lengths to which the Republican Party and their leader Donald Trump are willing to keep you from exercising you’re Constitutional right to vote are breathtaking in scope.

But it goes further than one political party or even one corrupt president. At its core, voter suppression is but one part of a scheme orchestrated by mega-wealthy individuals and corporate elites. Yes, the one percent crowd has an agenda. And that agenda doesn’t cater to us regular folk.

It’s about what’s in it for them. How can the millionaires and billionaires become even richer than they already are? How can they force their religious and often bigoted views on everyone else, even though most people disagree?

If these elitists want to dump more toxins in rivers and streams to help their bottom line? So be it. If they don’t like the idea of women having the right to control their bodies, even though most Americans agree they do, who cares? They’ve got two things that most of us do not have: money and power – and they’re willing to use both to upend our democracy to suit their needs.

We see this playing out in real-time with the nomination battle going on for the open Supreme Court seat, left vacant with the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. This past Tuesday, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) gave another clinic on what’s really going on with the Supreme Court and why Republicans are bending over backward to make sure Amy Coney Barrett is quickly confirmed before this years election.

It’s not the first time Whitehouse has weighed in on this issue. I did a post in 2018 highlighting one of his presentations to the Senate, which unveiled the real origins of how and why Republicans are reshaping the courts and who it is that’s pulling the puppet strings to make it all happen.

The basic gist of the scheme is this: outside non-profits, special interests, and advocacy groups like the Koch network, the Federalist Society, the Judicial Crisis Network, and the Pacific Legal Foundation are coordinating and spending millions of dollars making sure that Barrett and other far-right corporate justices are confirmed to lifetime seats on the judiciary.

According to the Washington Post, between 2014 and 217 alone, these groups collected more than $250 million in such donations, including, as Whitehouse pointed out, two single $17 million checks to back Trump Supreme Court picks Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh.

Whitehouse correctly asserted that you’d be a fool to think they do not want something in return when people donate this kind of money. And the five Republican-appointed Supreme Court Justices have been delivering the goods overwhelmingly in the recent history.

According to Whitehouse, since John Roberts joined the Court as Chief Justice under George W. Bush, 80 out of 80 cases were decided by a 5 to 4 conservative majority, where there’s been an identifiable Republican donor interest. Not only that, but these cases also seem to fall into four categories over and over again:

*Unlimited dark money in politics, which benefits only a select few who have these kinds of resources. Time and again, the unlimited money side wins; efforts to constrain this spending loses.

*Demean and knock down the civil jury process. I’m not sure, but I think Whitehouse means the corporate world’s advocacy for forced arbitration in an employee vs. employee dispute. They’d much rather keep arguments in-house. Civil juries have to follow the law and are not beholden to corporate interests.

*Weaken the regulatory agencies. If you’re a big polluter like the Koch’s and others, you want a weakened regulatory agency, not a strong one that enforces environmental rules and directives.

*Voting rights. We see this happening over and over. The Court gutted the Voting Rights Act and refused to weigh in on gerrymandering. Again, they don’t want all of us to vote. It’s about political power for big special interests.

So, my friends, I ask you this one simple question: Is this the kind of America you want? One beholden to only those at the top who have narrow-minded profit-driven motives? I can almost understand those who are one-issue voters – getting rid of Roe V Wade, for example. Maybe those particular voters like the idea of someone cutting checks for millions to advance their cause.

But for the rest of us, no thank you. In this election, the current president is conspicuously absent on campaign finance reform or dark money politics. He’s clueless, as his only goal is winning reelection by any means necessary – including blowing up our democracy.

Joe Biden, on the other hand, has a plan to clean things up in Washington. And it’s comprehensive. You can read more about it here. But here are the main components:

*Introduce a constitutional amendment to eliminate private dollars from our federal elections entirely.

*Enact legislation to provide voluntary matching public funds for federal candidates receiving small-dollar donations.

*Keep foreign money out of our elections.

*Restrict SuperPACs.

*Increase transparency of election spending.

*End dark money groups.

*Require real-time disclosure.

*Ban corporate PAC contributions to candidates, and prohibit lobbyist contributions to those who they lobby.

*Reform funding for national party conventions.

*Close the federal contractor loophole.

Can you imagine the United States of America if we were to enact even a few of these reforms? Wouldn’t it be nice if we knew these big money dark groups did not influence our elected officials and our judiciary? You never know, but we might get the country we all deserve – not the country the elites and wealthy want for themselves.

I’m under no illusion that electing Joe Biden will be a panacea for all that ails America. However, I know that selecting the other guy will give the powerful even more power and make the wealthy even wealthier.

If Biden becomes the next president, we need to make sure he adheres to his promises of making the government work for the people. That’s going to be our job. We need to push him to be better and do better for us – all of us. He has a chance, a real possibility, to be a transformative president. Yes, an FDR, or and LBJ, in terms of shaping how the government isn’t seen as an enemy of the people – but as a partner.

As Joe Biden has said, “Our Constitution doesn’t begin with the phrase, “We the Democrats” or “We the Republicans.” And it certainly doesn’t begin with the phrase, “We the Donors.”

It’s “We the people.”

Let’s give him the chance to prove it.

America’s Wakeup Call-Table of Contents

Discord & Dissension-Table of Contents

44 responses to “America’s Wakeup Call-It’s we the People, not we the Donors”

  1. Reblogged this on Filosofa's Word and commented:
    This week for our project, America’s Wake-Up Call, Jeff put his very heart and soul into his post. He shows us more than enough reasons why it is so very crucial to vote, and to vote for Joe Biden! So much is at stake … perhaps even more than we realize. Good work, Jeff! Thank you!

    Liked by 2 people

    1. No, thank you Jill!!!

      Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks for that Kim! Greatly appreciated

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I’ve never heard Whitehouse speak before now and never heard his breakdown of these important facts. Everyone seems provable and falls nicely into the narrative. It would be great if he convinced just enough Republicans to vote to delay the appointment of Barratt. Maybe that would give Trump apoplexy and solve the whole problem.
    Hugs

    Liked by 1 person

    1. He’s just very good at this David. He knows the law inside and out and he frames it in a way that most people can understand. I’d love it if you were correct, and a couple of Republicans get a spine. It’s really a stretch, though. I cannot imagine them doing the right thing….for once.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Fantastic post. Agree that Senator Whitehouse has been amazing these last 4 years. A real rock star of the Senate.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Thank you so much for that compliment. I agree. Don’t you think he’d make an excellent Chairman of that committee? I feel it’s time for Senator Feinstein to step away. It’s time for some new blood, in my view.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I feel it’s time for Senator Feinstein to step away.

        A-MEN/WOMEN to that! Her facelift hasn’t helped her political views — which also need updating, IMO.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. She should have never ran a few years ago. Time for new blood. There’s a deep bench in California!!

        Like

      3. If we win this election, Democrats who want to work across the aisle are going to find themselves in a tough spot. I think our voters are going to want to see them fight and not give a f*** about GOP feelings.

        Liked by 1 person

      4. I sure hope you’re right. The gloves have come off a long time ago. Obama tried reaching across the aisle. Almost every time…rejection. I cannot see that changing.

        Liked by 1 person

  4. I certainly hope Joe gets the opportunity to prove his words and to unite America…

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Me too Jim. I really think he’s got a good chance to do it. I thought the side by side town halls between him and Trump was very telling. Biden was hopeful, calming, competent, decent. Trump? Angry, petulant, lying….oh well, you know the rest Jim.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I did not watch them live, but read about the town halls afterward, and it seems like Biden was clearly the better candidate. 24 days…

        Liked by 1 person

      2. One more debate this Thursday Jim. I can only imagine what the unhinged man will say and do. Nothing surprises anymore.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. I have a feeling he is going to focus on the Hunter Biden story…

        Liked by 1 person

      4. LOL….over and over and over. It’s all he’s got

        Liked by 1 person

      5. and packing the courts, but that could backfire…

        Liked by 1 person

  5. Jeff, between Citizens United and the McCutcheon decisions (which allows people from across the country to invest in local races), SCOTUS has further enabled dark money (and even known money) to influence elections. When a Justice mouthed the word “That is not true” when Obama lamented about Citizens United, Obama was correct.

    These SCOTUS appointments, along with other appointments of judges, is less about social issues that effect us. They really are about money They are about limiting liability to corporations when they have done wrong. They are about making the rules and governance easier so they can cheat the system. We spend our time worrying about the social issues, while companies are stealing not only our candy, but our savings account.

    John Grisham wrote a great book around the time of Citizens United called “The Appeal,” which is a very telling read. And, if we think what occurs in that book is not happening elsewhere, we are being naive. It is why movies like “Erin Brockovich” or “Dark Waters” get made because the little guys who get screwed and killed do not win very often. There is a reason. Keiith

    Liked by 1 person

    1. So true Keith. It’s all rigged against us. These people are so addicted to power and profit. It’s going to be so hard now with a 6-3 conservative majority. All we can hope for is for the new president(If Joe wins) and a hopefully new Democratic majority Senate, forging ahead with legislation to deal with this stuff. Change our election laws, campaign finance, lobbying…all the above. That’s the only way to counteract this hijacking that’s been going on for years. BTW, I will put that Grisham book on my list of must-reads. It’s a growing list!

      Like

  6. Reblogged this on By Hook Or By Book and commented:
    This Wake Up Call from Jeff Is a Must Read!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you Kim!

      Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you so much for the reblog, and the follow! I’ve followed you back. Thanks for taking the time to read my post.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Most welcome, thank you for writing it. These are critical days…

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Yes they are critical days. 14 more to go!

        Liked by 1 person

  7. Put this on my a Twitter site. Thanks for great insight for boggled minds like mine.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you! Greatly appreciated. I’ll look for you on Twitter and follow, ok?

      Like

      1. I’m rarely there, but ince in a while I retweet things. I used to be quite active, not now.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Gotcha. I’m on there usually every day, at least for a few minutes. Usually it gets my blood pressure up!

        Like

      3. That’s why its rare.

        Liked by 1 person

  8. What are your thoughts on campaign finance reform?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi, and thank you for that question. Campaign finance reform is one of the most important areas of concern I have for our country. Until we get a handle of big/dark money in our politics, nothing will change. I was somewhat heartened by how some corporations decided to stop funding those politicians who voted to deny Biden his victory by questioning the results of election. This is exactly what we need. No more dark money-limit amounts all individuals can contribute-and provide some form of public financing. There’s even more we can and should do, but those three things would go along way towards giving us the democracy we actually deserve-not the one that primarily benefits the wealthy and powerful. Biden, himself, has a very strong anti-corruption and campaign finance platform. I really hope he goes for it. I think he’ll even get some republicans on his side if he does. We have to push him to do it. There’s so much that needs done as he enters office. We’re in some really rough waters right now. I hope he’ll find the time to tackle it. Again, one of my top concerns. Period.

      Like

      1. On a separate topic, I invite you to read, follow my blog and leave me any comments.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Thanks for the invite. I’m now following you. I’d like to invite you to do the same as well.

        Like

      3. I hope you enjoy the material I have up.

        Liked by 1 person

  9. One thing that I have heard is that spending money is a form of free speech. If money is speech, why is it perfectly fine to bribe politicians to make laws that are favorable to some groups and it is illegal to donate money over a specified threshold to a political campaign?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. You’re preaching to the choir my friend! Totally agree. I think if we were to totally reform our campaign finance laws so that they were equitable all the way around, it would fundamentally transform our democracy. I think the Dems want to do this-if they do, though, they won’t get much help from the other side. Frankly there are some Dems who also would like to keep the status quo. But they’re far outnumbered by those on the right. It’s one of my biggest issues. HR 1 is mentioned as a really good starting point to this. We’ll see how far it goes.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I am not saying that money is speech. Having said that, if one wants to make monetary expenditures equivalent to expressing speech, all laws that tell us what we can or cannot do should be seen as illegitimate.

        Liked by 2 people

      2. My thoughts on this are pretty simple. If you allow the rich/corporations to spend unlimited amounts of money through the largely unregulated SuperPacs, what you have is a government by the rich, for the rich, and of the rich. We need to ban it. Period. Also, I do not believe that corporations are ‘people.’ Of course they’re made up of people. But as it pertains to government, they are entities created by the state to make a profit. That’s what they are. So the idea that this is just them making a political statement by throwing $$$$$$ at politicians simply does not make any sense whatsoever. Until we stop allowing these oligarchs to basically own politicians, our democracy will never be what we deserve it to be. It’s a huge problem, in my view.

        Liked by 2 people

      3. You make valid points.

        Liked by 2 people

  10. For people who want to make the argument that spending money is equivalent to expressing speech, I would argue that campaign finance donations being limited are abridging freedom of speech on that basis. I am personally opposed to it as a career profession, however, if people want to become prostitutes and pursue sex work as a career choice and claim that they are exercising their right to free speech on that basis, that is on them.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a comment

In CASE YOU MISSED IT