Attack against the government started with Reagan

Posted by

“Government is not the solution to our problems. Government is the problem.”

None other than the great conservative hero Ronald Reagan spoke these famous words at his first inaugural address, in 1981. And who can forget another famous quote from Reagan: ‘The 10 most dangerous words in the English language are, ‘Hello, I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’ ”

Mr. Reagan was famous for his witty and folksy sayings over the years, but these quotes foreshadowed a darker and even diabolical intent that would come to represent the modern Republican Party more than Mr. Reagan ever could have imagined.

Whether he intended to or not, Mr. Reagan, with words such as these, spurred an unprecedented attack on government that has continued unabated for nearly four decades.

And it’s getting much worse.

When you attack something over and over and use the same talking points, many in the public begin to take the words seriously. How often have we heard about “big” government? How often have we heard that the government can’t do anything right?

I see and hear it every day, Republicans on television or on the radio bashing our government, letting all who will listen know they are doing everything in their power to limit government intrusion into our lives. But this unlimited attack on our institutions and system of government has led us down a path to destruction if we do nothing about it.

The corruption. The pay to play. The quid pro quo. The dismantling of the administrative state. All are hallmarks of the modern-day Republican Party, and if Democrats want to take back the Congress in 2018, they’d better get on the ethical soapbox and let the American people know which party represents them and which party represents the wealthy and powerful.

It’s really not hard for Democrats to point these things out. Over the past several years we’ve seen alarming examples of just how deep and wide the Republicans are beholden to corporations and influential special interests, rather than the American people and the Constitution. How about the NRA? In 1994, the Democrats passed the assault weapons ban, which expired in 2004. Republican President George W. Bush did not renew the ban, and the expiration continues to this day even though wide majorities of the American people would like to see it back in place. We’ve seen mass shooting after mass shooting. Nothing gets done. The NRA speaks and the Republican Party listens.

How about the Great Recession of 2008? The Dodd-Frank Act was passed in response to the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Since the day it went into law, the banking industry has tried to fight it or weaken it with a vengeance. And now, with all three branches of government in their hands, the Republicans have been doing just that. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an agency designed to protect the public from unscrupulous lenders and an offshoot of Dodd-Frank, is in serious jeopardy as the agency is being starved of funds and its leadership decimated.

How about Net Neutrality? Most Americans want a free an independent internet where data is treated equally by all providers. The Democrats are with the American people on this. The Republicans again side with the powerful internet provider companies.

On and on it goes. Just this past week, Secretary of the Treasury Steve Mnuchin announced the administration no longer would enforce disclosure requirements of certain tax-exempt organizations to the IRS. This would include politically active groups such as, you guessed it … the NRA. Mr. Mnuchin also has suggested weakening sanctions against a specific Russian corporation, which ironically comes on the heels of President Trump’s recent disastrous summit with Russian leader Vladimir Putin. And we cannot forget the horrendous and borderline treasonous activities of some House Republicans regarding the Mueller investigation into Trump. Just when we need checks and balances of the highest order, the party in charge is missing in action. Are they loyal to the American people and the Constitution, or are they loyal to Trump and big money?

It’s hard to know whether Mr. Reagan would have approved of the current makeup of the Republican Party. But it’s not a stretch to think he would have been terrified, especially with the current man who resides in the White House and who leads the party he once led himself. But quite honestly some of the blame goes to Mr. Reagan himself. His bashing of all things government-related veered the party down this road. It is now firmly entrenched as the party of money … the party of power… the party of corruption … and the party of Trump.

A nearly four-decade assault on our government and its institutions has reached a plateau even Mr. Reagan could not have imagined. I’ve heard many on the left say that Democrats need more to run on than just complete opposition to Trump. And I can’t disagree. But ignoring the vast corruption, pay to play, and borderline un-American actions of this Republican Party is not an option. The Democratic Party needs to become the only logical choice for those who fear what they see happening in the halls of Congress and the White House. It’s time to not only be the party of the “people” but also the party of ethics and good governance.

Ethics and good governance. Sounds like a good campaign slogan to me.

45 comments

  1. $Amen$ Great post. I agree completely. When Republicans say they don’t recognize their party or they don’t understand how it became what it is, I point to Reagan, too. It started there. Even the paranoid commercials Reagan used to run ,”There’s a bear in the woods; only Reagan can stop him”, are like the crap Trump does today. Since Reagan’s time, the Republicans have bred, nurtured, and seeded their party, and made it ripe for Trump’s takeover. Attack government. Make it the bad guy, and claim you’re the good guy who can fix it. Encourage paranoia and all the while, you’re selling out to big corporations and evil foreign governments in order to make rich Republicans richer. It’s infuriating and the damage is so wide and so deep, I’ve no idea if we can ever get out of it. November can’t come soon enough.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Thank you my friend. And to top it all off, they criticize the very entity that gives them great healthcare…power…and pensions. They will do anything to keep their jobs…anything…Just more evidence of the Hypocrisy Party!!!

      Liked by 2 people

    1. when liberal policies are on ballot initiatives they win with around 70% of the vote. the trick is to not say they are liberal policies. felon re enfranchisement in florida, pot, expanded medicaid. all liberal or socialist policies. and most want them! social security is a socialist program. it has social right in the name! so the older, whiter people vote republicon or orange conman party, but try talking about lowering their benefit and then they pay attention. how did 30% of our country become so stupid?!

      Liked by 2 people

      1. I’m already thinking about 2020. God forbid if the current POTUS is still in office. But, if he is…we’re going to need someone with some charisma. Someone who isn’t afraid to at it with him. A leader. And, damn it…a liberal. I totally agree with you about liberal ballot initiatives. Maybe someone like Beto? And they must be able to peel some of those angry white dudes back from oblivion. Some aren’t reachable. But some are. We can’t be afraid to engage them.
        Btw….welcome Steve. Good to have you on board and good luck with your new blog!

        Liked by 1 person

  2. finally. i’ve been saying for a while that the banking collapse that caused the great depression was ronald reagan’s fault for deregulating banking. and after the Dems passed laws to make our banking system safer, the republicons started rolling back the ‘over-regulation’.
    i’m laughing about the name of this blog. i recently started my blog and one of my goals was to bring us together. but i quickly changed my mind. can’t fix stupid. i initially was wanting to speak to the people in the middle that voted for Obama and then the orange conman. but then realized that all my writing was about how mad i am at the republicans and the koch brothers. decided to just say what i wanted without trying to sugarcoat it.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I hear you. We’re constantly evolving. I engage with some of the crazies on Twitter. It ain’t pretty! But more than anything, it’s about getting the truth out there about the two political parties. I don’t always agree with Dems in how they go about things. But hands down, their policies are far and above better than the out of touch racist and corporatist Republicans. They only get worse…not better. They need to go the way of the Whigs!!

      Liked by 1 person

    1. He began the “government isn’t the solution to our problems, government IS the problem” BS. It still is the mantra of the modern-day Republican Party, yet, they do everything and anything they can to get elected, and to keep getting reelected. Why? Can you answer that question? Is it the free parking at the Capitol and 174k a year?

      Liked by 1 person

      1. As a % of GDP, Gov is about 18-20. Doesn’t seem too big to me, especially in a country as vast as ours, with a population of 330 million. Your solution, it appears, is to just let the free market operate without guardrails or rules of any kind with basically no taxation. That’s la la land thinking. Again, what country on earth has anything like that, that is actually successful? You haven’t answered that question.

        Like

      2. Brookingslib, Somalia may have its share of issues. However, they seem to respect gun ownership rights, unlike those hypocrites in our government who want to deny our right to keep and bear arms and yet have security that is armed to the teeth.

        Like

      3. Jeff, you seem to be able to articulate things more effectively than Nan and seem to be more willing to engage in a rational discussion. We may disagree on some things, however, I seem to have an easier time communicating with you than Nan.

        Like

      4. Somalia? Really? Saying they have issues is a massive understatement friend. Nobody in government is trying to take your guns. Give me a break. The guy who just shot up the VTA in San Jose had 22k rounds of ammo and guns coming out of his ass. Why in God’s name anyone in America needs this kind of arsenal is beyond me. Thanks to people such as yourself, we’re becoming THE laughingstock of the world when it comes to violence in our streets, our workplaces, hell-anywhere in public for that matter. I have to look over my shoulder everywhere now for some nut case with an assault weapon ready mow me and others down for no reason whatsoever. 2nd Amendment my ass. I’m sick of this crap. You should be ashamed. But I’m sure you’re not

        Like

      5. Brookingslib, “assault” weapon is a misnomer. Since anything could be used in an assault, anything could be deemed an “assault” weapon.

        Like

      6. Oh, you mean like your car etc..? Another right-wing talking point friend. That’s BS. A firearm is made to kill either humans or animals. A car, is not. kill. A car is meant to drive and get you places. Why the obsession with firearms in America? What is it that makes them so attractive to you and others? I don’t get it. I will never get it. I’d love to get rid of all of them. I know it will never happen but that’s how I feel. We disagree. As we do on most things.

        Like

      7. No, you haven’t, and I appreciate that fact. Sorry about that. I’m very passionate about this issue. Again, like clockwork in America, another mass shooting last night in Miami. Barely even registers as a story anymore. Something has to change.

        Liked by 1 person

      8. I really haven’t given it much thought to be honest. I used to think he was pretty good when he was doing 20/20 years ago. But he seemed to veer pretty far to the right at some point. So I stopped paying attention to him. Like I said, he did do some good work on ABC. But that’s been a long time ago.

        Liked by 2 people

      9. Brookingslib, while I disagree with them politically, I like Thom Hartmann, Sam Seder, Secular Talk with Kyle Kulinski, The Young Turks and the David Pakman Show.

        Like

      10. Interesting. I like all of them, but have been listening to Hartmann for the longest time. You’re a better man than me my friend. I can’t do conservative talk. I just can’t. I do appreciate the never Trumper Republicans, though, like Bill Krystal, George Will, Joe Walsh, Rick Wilson. They’re all decent guys who resemble what used to be the Republican Party of old. The Party today is not recognizable.

        Like

  3. Nan, please enlighten me as to how Jeff’s questions have not been directly answered. I have tried to have some discussions with you on things, however, you seem to be disinterested.

    Like

    1. I don’t know what you mean, friend. I’ve been debating you for weeks now on all sorts of subjects.

      Like

      1. Brookingslib, maybe I offered a bad choice of words. When I have tried to engage you in discussions, I think you and I reach an impasse because I am trying to find solutions to issues on which we disagree and some communication issues seem to arise.

        Like

      2. I appreciate the fact that you do seem interested in finding solutions. I’m all for that. What I’m not all for is continuing to go down the road about people sitting on their butts because of government benefits. We do not need to go there anymore because we’ve both expressed our feelings on the subject over and over. So, yes, an impasse, if you will.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. Brookingslib, just so there is no risk of potential miscommunication, I am not anti-government. I just believe that government should be strictly limited to its Constitutional confines.

        Liked by 1 person

  4. Jeff, I worded that comment about discussion with you badly. My apologies. I meant to say that I have tried to engage with Nan on some issues, however, I have come across an obstacle here.

    Nan, I have an admittedly libertarian view of the world. I believe that the USA should stay out of affairs that don’t concern us.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Brookingslib, I was careless with my wording in one comment. I meant to say Nan seemed to be the harder person to rationally discuss some of this stuff with. Having said that, you both have your facts wrong, particularly the gun issue.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s